<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax Frameworks and Heterogeneous UI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/06/ajax-frameworks-and-heterogeneous-ui/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/06/ajax-frameworks-and-heterogeneous-ui</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:56:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/06/ajax-frameworks-and-heterogeneous-ui/comment-page-1#comment-43666</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2007/06/ajax-frameworks-and-heterogeneous-ui/#comment-43666</guid>
		<description>Hey Subbu... Nice post. I even think the same way. I want my client code to be independent of the server code. When I first read GWT&#039;s RPC approach, I thought the same way. But seeing that GWT can also work with normal Ajax calls without using RPC I was relieved. I didn&#039;t want to miss out the advantage of using GWT and coding client UI in Java just because of this reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Subbu&#8230; Nice post. I even think the same way. I want my client code to be independent of the server code. When I first read GWT&#8217;s RPC approach, I thought the same way. But seeing that GWT can also work with normal Ajax calls without using RPC I was relieved. I didn&#8217;t want to miss out the advantage of using GWT and coding client UI in Java just because of this reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

