<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JSON as a General Purpose Alternative?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative</link>
	<description>HTTP, REST and some Cycling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: subbu.org</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>subbu.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;JSON Wars Continue&lt;/strong&gt;

JSON vs XML wars are still going on, and they are becoming more amusing, I must say. The latest is from Sean McGrath arguing about the significance of mixed content in XML....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>JSON Wars Continue</strong></p>
<p>JSON vs XML wars are still going on, and they are becoming more amusing, I must say. The latest is from Sean McGrath arguing about the significance of mixed content in XML&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subbu Allamaraju</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Subbu Allamaraju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Zach - the key point is that, outside Javascript/browser world, passing structs as JSON data does not make much sense.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach &#8211; the key point is that, outside Javascript/browser world, passing structs as JSON data does not make much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2007/01/json-as-a-general-purpose-alternative/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I think the major thing that people are missing with JSON vs XML is that there are many, many libraries that do encoding and decoding.  The thing I personally love about JSON is that i can pass around data structures... without caring how they are represented!!  One encode call on the server, a decode call on the client and then I&#039;m back to directly accessing the data.  IMHO, that is the true advantage of JSON.  The other things like it being lightweight, javascript friendly, etc are just side benefits
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the major thing that people are missing with JSON vs XML is that there are many, many libraries that do encoding and decoding.  The thing I personally love about JSON is that i can pass around data structures&#8230; without caring how they are represented!!  One encode call on the server, a decode call on the client and then I&#8217;m back to directly accessing the data.  IMHO, that is the true advantage of JSON.  The other things like it being lightweight, javascript friendly, etc are just side benefits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
