<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Reasons to Avoid State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.subbu.org/blog/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state</link>
	<description>HTTP, REST and some Cycling</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Subbu Allamaraju</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Subbu Allamaraju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the comment "You're mixing things up: statelesness/statefulness does not have anything J2EE deplyment descriptors..."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;True. The issue is not about deployment descriptors, but the way most of these servers maintain their own state. The result is rigidity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the comment &#8220;You&#8217;re mixing things up: statelesness/statefulness does not have anything J2EE deplyment descriptors&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>True. The issue is not about deployment descriptors, but the way most of these servers maintain their own state. The result is rigidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No one</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>No one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Try to build any application without state.  It's impossible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to build any application without state.  It&#8217;s impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behrang Saeedzadeh</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Behrang Saeedzadeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>You're mixing things up: statelesness/statefulness does not have anything to do with J2EE deplyment descriptors. Deployment descriptors are necessary, whether you want to maintain state in your application or not.

And the problem with shopping cart config file can be solved without losing state. One way can be to check the modification date of the config file periodically. And this also is not only a problem that stateful applications: A stateless application may also load some configuration parameters from config files at deployment time.

By the way, you're talking about session state, aren't you?

And I'm not sure if it's good to avoid state or not, but whatever, happy new year ;-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re mixing things up: statelesness/statefulness does not have anything to do with J2EE deplyment descriptors. Deployment descriptors are necessary, whether you want to maintain state in your application or not.</p>
<p>And the problem with shopping cart config file can be solved without losing state. One way can be to check the modification date of the config file periodically. And this also is not only a problem that stateful applications: A stateless application may also load some configuration parameters from config files at deployment time.</p>
<p>By the way, you&#8217;re talking about session state, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s good to avoid state or not, but whatever, happy new year ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D. Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.subbu.org/blog/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>John D. Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.subbu.org/2004/12/more-reasons-to-avoid-state/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>"State is the second worst thing in distributed computing.&lt;br /&gt;
&#160;No state is the worst." --John Ousterhout
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;State is the second worst thing in distributed computing.<br />
&nbsp;No state is the worst.&#8221; &#8211;John Ousterhout</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
